Economic Rules Hub
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
Home Politics Voters react to Gov Tim Walz dodging Tiananmen Square question: ‘I’m a knucklehead at times’
Politics

Voters react to Gov Tim Walz dodging Tiananmen Square question: ‘I’m a knucklehead at times’

by admin October 2, 2024
October 2, 2024

A focus group of Democrats, independents and Republicans reacted to the moment when Gov. Tim Walz called himself a ‘knucklehead’ for claiming to have been in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square massacre.

Moderators confronted Walz on the claim during the CBS News Vice Presidential Debate Tuesday night. Walz admitted that he only traveled to Asia in August 1989, several months after the April 15 massacre. The focus group found that voters were initially skeptical of Walz’s answer, but he eventually recovered.

‘Can you explain that discrepancy?’ a moderator asked, as the focus group remained neutral.

‘Look, I grew up in small rural Nebraska, a town of 400. A town that you rode your bikes with your buddies until the streetlights come on, and I’m proud of that service. I joined the national guard at 17, worked on family farms, and then I used the GI bill to become a teacher. Passionate about it. Young teacher. My first year out, I got the opportunity in the summer of ’89 to travel to China–35 years ago, to be able to do that,’ Walz said.

‘I came back home and started a program to take young people there. We would take basketball teams, we would take baseball teams, we would take dancers, and we would go back and forth to China,’ he added.

The focus group showed support from Republicans, independents and Democrats all going down for Walz during the first portion of his response.

However, Walz recovered among independents and Democrats when he went on to admit that he can be ‘a knucklehead at times.’

‘Many times I will talk a lot. I will get caught up in the rhetoric,’ he said, as support from independents rose above 50% in the focus group.

Walz’s support among Republicans dipped to its lowest point – under 10% – when he said former President Donald Trump would have benefited from participating in one of his China trips, arguing Trump would never have befriended Chinese President Xi Jinping.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Several questions about Walz’s record not asked about during vice presidential debate
next post
Walz faces backlash after defending Obama-era mandate repealed by Trump: ‘Massive tax penalty’

Related Posts

State Department confirms ‘constructive’ nuclear talks with Iran; Trump says...

May 16, 2025

Far-left congresswoman revives ousted ‘Squad’ Dem’s reparations push for Black...

May 16, 2025

Rubio doubts ‘anything productive’ will happen in Ukraine peace talks...

May 16, 2025

GOP rebel mutiny threatens to derail Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’...

May 16, 2025

Gabbard says Comey should be ‘put behind bars’ after picture...

May 16, 2025

RFK Jr’s HHS to end routine COVID vaccine guidance for...

May 16, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • A US-backed group says it will deliver aid to Gaza, but humanitarian organizations are skeptical. Here’s what we know

      May 16, 2025
    • The Russia-Ukraine peace process is going exactly how Moscow wants it to: slowly

      May 16, 2025
    • A day of confusion and chaos as Russia and Ukraine agree to first direct talks in 3 years

      May 16, 2025
    • Trump and Abu Dhabi ink partnership to build massive AI data center complex in UAE

      May 16, 2025
    • Construction tycoon among 17 wanted in Thailand over deadly tower collapse

      May 16, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,357)
    • Investing (3,250)
    • Politics (4,364)
    • World (4,273)
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contacts
    • About us

    Disclaimer: EconomicRulesHub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 EconomicRulesHub.com | All Rights Reserved

    Economic Rules Hub
    • World
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Investing