Economic Rules Hub
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
Home Business Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL
Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by admin August 3, 2024
August 3, 2024

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh was killed in Iran by bomb planted months before blast, source says
next post
Markets are clamoring for the Fed to start cutting soon: ‘What is it they’re looking for?’

Related Posts

U.S. online stores put up ‘out of stock’ signs as...

June 12, 2025

U.S. online stores put ‘out of stock’ signs as Nintendo...

June 12, 2025

Chipotle to launch Adobo Ranch dip after sluggish start to...

June 11, 2025

‘He’s like Iron Man’: Jensen Huang lit up London Tech...

June 11, 2025

Walmart is using its own fintech firm to provide credit...

June 11, 2025

Tesla stock sinks as Musk and Trump ridicule each other

June 9, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Trump tells Netanyahu to end Gaza war and stop Iran threats, source says, as US ramps up pressure on Israel

      June 12, 2025
    • Children swept away in school bus among at least 49 killed in South Africa flooding

      June 12, 2025
    • Israel recovers bodies of two dead hostagesfrom Gaza in military operation

      June 12, 2025
    • Gaza Humanitarian Foundation says Hamas attack has killed multiple aid workers

      June 12, 2025
    • Trump administration reviewing Biden-era submarine pact with Australia, UK

      June 12, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,401)
    • Investing (3,435)
    • Politics (4,594)
    • World (4,506)
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contacts
    • About us

    Disclaimer: EconomicRulesHub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 EconomicRulesHub.com | All Rights Reserved

    Economic Rules Hub
    • World
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Investing