Economic Rules Hub
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
Home Business Tesla asks shareholders to vote again on Musk’s $56 billion payout
Business

Tesla asks shareholders to vote again on Musk’s $56 billion payout

by admin April 18, 2024
April 18, 2024

Tesla said Wednesday it will ask shareholders to reinstate CEO Elon Musk’s $56 billion pay package, which a Delaware judge voided earlier this year after ruling that the record-setting compensation deal was “deeply flawed.”

Tesla also said it would ask shareholders to approve moving the company’s incorporation from Delaware to Texas. Musk had suggested the move after his pay package was ruled illegal. The announcement Wednesday came days after the automaker said it would cut its workforce by 10%.

Tesla said the court decision created a “fundamental problem for the company.”

The two proposals are likely to be fiercely controversial. Tesla has hired a proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A, and plans to spend an undetermined amount, in the millions, to help secure the votes for the two proposals, according to the filing.

Tesla has not hired Innisfree since 2018, when it first asked shareholders to vote on Musk’s pay package. Companies often only advertise the cost of proxy solicitations when major proposals or proxy fights are expected. (Innisfree was also suing Musk’s Twitter over unpaid bills.)

Musk’s pay package was invalidated after a shareholder won a lawsuit against the company earlier this year. Delaware Chancery Court Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick found that Musk, rather than Tesla’s board, controlled the company and that the board’s compensation committee, rather than negotiating with Musk over the terms of the deal, “worked alongside him, almost as an advisory body.”

The Tornetta decision, named after Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta who brought the suit, prompted Musk to say, “Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware.”

McCormick was also the presiding judge in the legal action compelling Musk to buy Twitter, which he renamed. Tesla, in its Wednesday filing, cast doubt on her decision. “The Company and the Board believe that the decision in Tornetta ignored material evidence presented at trial and that the Delaware Court made errors of fact and incorrect conclusions of law,” Tesla said in the proxy filing.

The company also noted that “dozens of institutional stockholders” have told Tesla that they disagree with the Tornetta decision.

Delaware has long been a preferred home for corporations — more than 60% of the Fortune 500 companies are incorporated there — because the state has a robust legal framework and court system dedicated to resolving corporate issues, like executive pay, but also broader contract negotiations.

Tesla’s new proposal cautions shareholders that the Delaware court found the company’s initial 2018 disclosures to be deficient, and urged them to read the full text of the decision.

In January, the same day the pay package was rejected, Musk asked his X followers if Tesla should reincorporate in Texas. Months later, Tesla’s board agreed and is now proposing the move to Texas and asking shareholders to approve the move.

Tesla connected the Delaware decision directly to its proposal, but it said that both Elon Musk and his brother Kimbal Musk, who also sits on Tesla’s board, recused themselves from deliberations.

The company said that Tesla’s “home and future are in Texas” and that the board considered every U.S. state before narrowing it down to a head-to-head comparison between Delaware and Texas, Musk’s public comments notwithstanding.

Tesla also defends the move as commonplace, saying that 35% of S&P 500 companies are not incorporated in Delaware. The company acknowledged Delaware’s court system as world class, but said “doing new things is part of Tesla’s DNA, and how it has become one of the most valuable companies in the world.”

CNBC’s Lora Kolodny and Dan Mangan contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Tesla job cuts heighten Wall Street concerns that EV maker faces a demand problem
next post
Carbon Done Right

Related Posts

Palantir joins list of 20 most valuable U.S. companies, with...

July 27, 2025

FCC greenlights Paramount’s $8 billion merger with entertainment group Skydance

July 26, 2025

Microsoft’s Satya Nadella says job cuts have been ‘weighing heavily’...

July 26, 2025

Uber will let women drivers and riders request to avoid...

July 25, 2025

Alphabet beats earnings expectations, raises spending forecast

July 25, 2025

UnitedHealth says it is facing DOJ investigation over Medicare billing...

July 25, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Trump-inspired ‘Japanese first’ politician shakes up nation’s establishment

      July 28, 2025
    • Iran’s Africa activities pose ‘significant threats to US national security’

      July 28, 2025
    • White House orders Hegseth to stop polygraphs on Pentagon staff suspected of leaking: report

      July 28, 2025
    • Rubio downplays 2028 talk, touts Vance as Trump’s successor

      July 28, 2025
    • Freedom Caucus lawmaker Ralph Norman vows to ‘shake things up’ in South Carolina governor bid

      July 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,465)
    • Investing (3,766)
    • Politics (5,010)
    • World (4,720)
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contacts
    • About us

    Disclaimer: EconomicRulesHub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 EconomicRulesHub.com | All Rights Reserved

    Economic Rules Hub
    • World
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Investing