Economic Rules Hub
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
Home Politics McCaul threatens to hold Blinken in contempt of Congress for ‘withholding’ key Afghanistan documents
Politics

McCaul threatens to hold Blinken in contempt of Congress for ‘withholding’ key Afghanistan documents

by admin February 28, 2024
February 28, 2024

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, is threatening to hold Secretary of State Antony Blinken in contempt of Congress, accusing him of failing to hand over key documents related to the U.S.’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

At the heart of the issue are interview notes that were used to put together the State Department’s After-Action Review (AAR) of the Afghanistan withdrawal.

‘The Committee’s patience has been exhausted, and it requires these files to complete its investigation and make legislative recommendations for this Congress to consider,’ McCaul wrote.

‘Should the Department fail to produce the… files outlined below by March 6, 2024, the Committee is prepared to hold you in contempt of Congress.’

He also accused Blinken of choosing ‘politics over policy’ with the State Department’s decision to ‘withhold’ the documents.

It’s notably harsh language for McCaul, whose relationship with Blinken is relatively more cordial than that of other House Republican committee chairs investigating the Biden administration.

In his letter, he noted multiple instances in which McCaul accused the department of stonewalling, including after he first requested notes from interviews with State officials taken by then-Ambassador Dan Smith, who led the AAR in September 2023. 

He also listed ways in which the committee sought to accommodate the department. For example, McCaul wrote that the committee offered to redact names and address security concerns after State officials told him providing the notes would have a ‘significant chilling effect on the Department’s ability to conduct thorough and impactful lessons learned efforts to improve our foreign policy-making.’

‘On November 28, 2023, the Committee once more requested the interview notes, stating that the Department had failed to produce any high-priority items in its last eight productions,’ the letter said. ‘For the next month, the Department stated the priority items requested, including the AAR team’s interview notes, ‘either belong to a third agency or implicate significant Executive Branch confidentiality interests.’’

When committee staff stressed that the documents were critical to the House’s probe, State officials responded that the decision was above their ‘paygrade,’ according to the letter.

‘The Department’s stated reasons for withholding the interview notes are not rooted in law and, in fact, contravene Congress’s constitutional and statutory oversight authority,’ McCaul wrote. ‘It is appalling that over two years after the deadly and chaotic withdrawal, the Department continues to choose politics over policy.’

The Afghanistan AAR placed blame on both the Trump and Biden administrations for the disastrous withdrawal in August 2021.

It said, ‘there was insufficient senior-level consideration of worst-case scenarios and how quickly those might follow.’

The report said President Biden’s decision to follow through with former President Donald Trump’s vow to withdraw troops from Afghanistan – and to set a Sept. 11 deadline for it – ultimately ‘compounded the difficulties the Department faced in mitigating the loss of the military’s key enablers.’

It was also critical of the Biden administration’s decision to hand over control of Bagram Air Base to the Afghan government, a decision that also earned Biden bipartisan condemnation from national security hawks.

Fox News Digital reached out to the State Department about McCaul’s letter but did not immediately hear back.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Sen Hawley warns consulting firms against working with China to ‘undermine America’
next post
Biden running out of time to fulfill 2020 campaign pledge to abolish federal death penalty

Related Posts

Trump’s plan to slash ‘woke’ foreign aid, NPR funds clears...

June 13, 2025

White House takes interest in proposed Russian sanctions as Ukraine...

June 13, 2025

Israel launches sweeping strike on Iran while Trump administration seeks...

June 13, 2025

Mike Lawler tells NY Dem to ‘f— off’ after chaos...

June 13, 2025

‘Fully justified’: Graham plows ahead with Trump border funding despite...

June 13, 2025

‘Killed off Elmo’: Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt...

June 13, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Huge coin collection found hidden in house’s walls sells for nearly $3.5 million

      June 13, 2025
    • The UK, Germany and Canada have slashed foreign aid this year, deepening damage done by US cuts, analysis shows

      June 13, 2025
    • What we know about the Air India plane crash

      June 13, 2025
    • Peru is considering sending foreign prisoners to El Salvador

      June 13, 2025
    • A miracle in seat 11A: What we know about the sole survivor of Air India crash Vishwash Kumar Ramesh

      June 13, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,402)
    • Investing (3,444)
    • Politics (4,604)
    • World (4,516)
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contacts
    • About us

    Disclaimer: EconomicRulesHub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 EconomicRulesHub.com | All Rights Reserved

    Economic Rules Hub
    • World
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Investing