Economic Rules Hub
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
Home World World Court dismisses much of Ukraine’s case against Russia
World

World Court dismisses much of Ukraine’s case against Russia

by admin February 1, 2024
February 1, 2024

Judges at the top UN court on Wednesday found that Russia violated elements of a UN anti-terrorism treaty, but declined to rule on allegations brought by Kyiv that Moscow was responsible for the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine in 2014.

In the same ruling, judges at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that Russia had breached an anti-discrimination treaty by failing to support Ukrainian language education in Crimea after its 2014 annexation of the peninsula.

The decisions were a legal setback for Kyiv. The court rejected Ukraine’s requests to order reparations for both violations and only ordered Russia to comply with the treaties.

Ukraine’s representative Anton Korynevych stressed the judgment was important for Kyiv because it did establish Russia violated international law.

“This is the first time that officially, legally Russia is called a violator of international law,” he told journalists after the ruling.

Ukraine had filed the lawsuit at the ICJ, also known as the World Court, in 2017, accusing Russia of violating an anti-terrorism treaty by funding pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine.

The court’s judges said Moscow violated the UN’s anti-terrorism treaty by not investigating plausible allegations that some funds were sent from Russia to Ukraine to possibly fund terrorist activities.

The 16-judge panel ordered Russia to investigate any plausible allegations of terrorism financing but turned down a request by Kyiv for reparations.

The court declined to rule on the downing of MH17, saying violations of funding terrorism only applied to monetary and financial support, not to supplying weapons or training as alleged by Ukraine.

Ukraine had argued that Russia supplied the missile system that shot down the aircraft, but it had not alleged financial support in that instance.

In a hearing at the court in The Hague last June, Russia dismissed Ukraine’s allegations that it funded and controlled pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine as fiction and “blatant lies”.

In the case, which has taken almost seven years, Kyiv had accused Russia of equipping and funding pro-Russian forces, including rebels who shot down MH17 in July 2014, killing all 298 passengers and crew.

In November 2022, a Dutch court sentenced two Russians and a Ukrainian in absentia to life imprisonment for their role in the disaster.

In Crimea, Ukraine had said Russia was trying to erase the culture of ethnic Tatars and Ukrainians. The court dismissed all of the claims related to the Tatars but found Moscow did not do enough to support Ukrainian language education.

The court’s judgments are final and without appeal, but it has no way to enforce its rulings.

On Friday, the ICJ will rule in another case in which Ukraine has accused Moscow of falsely applying the 1948 Genocide Convention to justify its Feb. 24, 2022, invasion.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Graham tells Zuckerberg, ‘you have blood on your hands,’ audience cheers
next post
Why Yemen’s Houthi rebels welcome conflict with the US

Related Posts

Critics slam Mexico’s gentrification protests as xenophobic. Activists say they’re...

July 11, 2025

Does Putin hit back when Trump criticizes his ‘bullsh*t?’

July 10, 2025

South Korea’s former President Yoon Suk Yeol back in custody...

July 10, 2025

Deadly strikes on Kyiv as Russia continues ferocious bombardment of...

July 10, 2025

Trump praises ‘good English’ of Liberian president, prompting criticism across...

July 10, 2025

A piece of the illegally felled Sycamore Gap tree is...

July 10, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Republicans fixated on Epstein are getting ‘duped’ by Democrats, Trump insists

      July 17, 2025
    • Iran faces August deadline to accept comprehensive nuclear deal or face renewed UN sanctions

      July 17, 2025
    • Newsom taunts Trump with series of comments about president’s ties to Epstein amid efforts to avoid subject

      July 17, 2025
    • LEE ZELDIN: Trump’s EPA clearing the regulatory path for America to dominate the global AI revolution

      July 17, 2025
    • ‘Long overdue’: Senate Republicans ram through Trump’s clawback package with cuts to foreign aid, NPR

      July 17, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,450)
    • Investing (3,686)
    • Politics (4,917)
    • World (4,720)
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contacts
    • About us

    Disclaimer: EconomicRulesHub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 EconomicRulesHub.com | All Rights Reserved

    Economic Rules Hub
    • World
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Investing