Economic Rules Hub
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
Home Business Chase customers sue over fees for depositing checks that bounce
Business

Chase customers sue over fees for depositing checks that bounce

by admin February 22, 2024
February 22, 2024

JPMorgan Chase was sued by customers who accused the largest U.S. bank of having unfairly charged fees when they deposited checks that, through no fault of their own, bounced.

In a proposed class action filed on Tuesday night, five customers said New York-based Chase docked $12 “deposited item returned fees” from their accounts when checks they tried to deposit were returned unpaid.

Checks can bounce for many reasons, including when writers do not have enough money in their accounts or issue stop payment orders, or when the checks contain errors.

The Chase customers called the bank’s “junk fees” for returned checks “unconscionable” and “predatory,” citing an October 2022 U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau bulletin that said indiscriminately charging such fees was likely illegal.

“By charging these deposited item return fees, Chase unfairly targeted its customers with financial penalties for faulty checks the customers had no hand in issuing,” the complaint said. “They did nothing wrong, yet were penalized.”

Chase declined to comment on the lawsuit, but said it stopped charging the fees in December 2022.

The five customers said they were charged between November 2021 and October 2022.

Their lawyer Lisa Considine called imposing the fees “a pervasive and unfair industry practice.”

The complaint seeks at least $5 million of damages for Chase customers nationwide, alleging violations of New York, California, Illinois and New Jersey consumer protection laws. It was filed in the White Plains, New York federal court.

In October, the Biden administration called for a crackdown on hidden and surprise fees in banking and other sectors including car rentals, hotels and concert tickets, saying the fees cost Americans tens of billions of dollars a year.

The case is Maslowski et al v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 24-01277.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
More than 15 million Toshiba laptop adapters recalled due to fire hazards
next post
The IRS will pursue business private jet usage in a new round of audits on high-wealth taxpayers

Related Posts

Trump implies government could cut contracts and subsidies to Musk’s...

June 8, 2025

Procter & Gamble to cut 7,000 jobs as part of...

June 7, 2025

Shein and Temu see U.S. demand plunge as loophole for...

June 6, 2025

This California startup is cleaning water and removing CO₂ from...

June 6, 2025

Nationwide coordinated retail crime crackdown results in hundreds of arrests,...

June 5, 2025

McDonald’s Snack Wrap is officially making a permanent return

June 5, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Planned Russia-Ukraine prisoner swap descends into blame game and uncertainty

      June 8, 2025
    • Bruce Springsteen’s European tour comes with a warning about the battle for America’s soul

      June 8, 2025
    • Israel says it has killed leader of Palestinian militant group that took part in October 7 attack

      June 8, 2025
    • Colombian presidential hopeful Miguel Uribe shot in Bogota

      June 8, 2025
    • Desperate to get its illegally detained civilians out of Russia, Kyiv offers Ukrainian collaborators in exchange

      June 8, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,395)
    • Investing (3,407)
    • Politics (4,562)
    • World (4,471)
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contacts
    • About us

    Disclaimer: EconomicRulesHub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 EconomicRulesHub.com | All Rights Reserved

    Economic Rules Hub
    • World
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Investing