Economic Rules Hub
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
Home Politics Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges
Politics

Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges

by admin December 25, 2024
December 25, 2024

A top ally of President Biden is ‘disappointed’ after he vetoed a bill that would have increased the number of federal judges currently serving.

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., who served as a campaign co-chair for both of Biden’s recent presidential campaigns, stressed that he and his Republican colleague Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., kept bipartisanship top of mind when crafting the bill.

‘I am disappointed by this outcome, for my own state and for the federal judges throughout the country struggling under the burden of ever-higher caseloads. I’ve worked on this bill for years, and thanks to tireless bipartisan effort with Senator Young, it made it to the president’s desk. It’s highly unfortunate that it will not become law,’ Coons said in a statement on Tuesday.

He then put the blame on House Republicans for the bill’s ultimate failure, however, for voting on it after the 2024 election.

‘Senator Young and I took pains to make this a nonpartisan process, structuring the JUDGES Act so that Congress could pass the bill before any of us – Republican or Democrat – knew who would occupy the White House in 2025 and therefore nominate the new federal judges,’ Coons said.

‘The Senate did its part by passing the bill unanimously in August; the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, however, waited for election results before moving the bill forward. As a result, the White House is now vetoing this bill.’

Republicans in turn have accused Biden of making threats to veto the bill – which he issued two days before the House voted on it – to avoid giving President-elect Trump new roles to fill.

‘This important legislation garnered broad, bipartisan support when it unanimously passed the Senate in August because it directly addresses the pressing need to reduce case backlogs in our federal courts and strengthen the efficiency of our judicial system,’ Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., pointed out in a statement after the bill passed earlier this month.

 ‘At that time, Democrats supported the bill – they thought Kamala Harris would win the presidency. Now, however, the Biden-Harris administration has chosen to issue a veto threat and Democrats have whipped against this bill, standing in the way of progress, simply because of partisan politics.’

The bill would have added 66 federal district judicial roles, spreading their creation out over more than 10 years to prevent a boon on new appointments for any one administration. 

At the time of its Senate passage, Democrats’ morale was high after Biden ducked out of the 2024 race and was replaced by Vice President Kamala Harris.

It passed the Senate with unanimous consent, however, meaning no Republicans objected to the legislation’s advancement.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
US citizen imprisoned in Russia given new 15-year sentence in wake of espionage conviction
next post
Timeshare terror leaves retired couple $50K in the hole after being scammed

Related Posts

Trump touts administration’s progress on peace deals, says world leaders...

June 28, 2025

Trump says ‘big, beautiful’ bill ‘must’ meet deadline as some...

June 28, 2025

JD Vance poised to clinch victory for Trump’s landmark bill...

June 28, 2025

Anxious Republicans turn to Trump amid divisions over ‘big, beautiful...

June 28, 2025

Venezuelan opposition member details harrowing 400-day captivity at UN

June 28, 2025

Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ faces Republican family feud as Senate...

June 28, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent

    • Oslo police announce rape and sexual assault charges against son of Norwegian crown princess

      June 28, 2025
    • Russia has amassed 110,000 troops near strategic Ukrainian city, Kyiv says

      June 28, 2025
    • Israeli military rejects report that soldiers told to fire at Palestinians waiting for food, after repeated deadly incidents

      June 28, 2025
    • How authorities found a drug kingpin’s luxurious hideout in Ecuador

      June 28, 2025
    • 75 years after he was kidnapped to North Korea, these sisters still hope to see their brother

      June 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,424)
    • Investing (3,546)
    • Politics (4,750)
    • World (4,624)
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contacts
    • About us

    Disclaimer: EconomicRulesHub.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2024 EconomicRulesHub.com | All Rights Reserved

    Economic Rules Hub
    • World
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Investing